Video: Freedom and responsibility as a unity of contradictions
2024 Author: Henry Conors | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-02-12 02:54
Freedom and responsibility - what is the meaning of these concepts? Freedom in itself is a rather broad definition of both human capabilities and a philosophical canon on which far more than one treatise of the Athenian sages is based. To be free means to have oneself exactly to the extent that the possibilities of this or that person allow it. But at the same time, it is difficult not to get confused in the definitions, trying to distinguish between “freedom from” and “freedom for” by characteristics.
The first forms a space of complete anarchy, releasing the animal nature of man and the desire for chaos. The second characteristic, on the contrary, implies freedom enshrined in a multitude of legal documents. It allows you to enjoy the inalienable rights received from birth, without violating the personal space of other people. Thus, if the firstdefinition is chaotic and does not accept systematics, the second implies the conditional responsibility of the individual for his deeds, thoughts and deeds.
But the question of the topic under consideration today is freedom and responsibility, which means that, giving definitions to the first, it follows from it that the second should be deduced. Responsibility, in the narrow sense of the word, implies the possibilities limited by the law and morality of a person to be responsible for the committed actions. But if everything is more or less clear with the legal characteristic, then what about morality? Freedom and responsibility in the moral and ethical sense are inseparable concepts that depend on each other. And, accordingly, every person has them, regardless of his legal capacity, legal capacity and other legal aspects. Morality, on the other hand, is a much broader scope, if only because, unlike the law, it examines a person from the inside, giving a complete description of all accomplished or non-accomplished deeds within the possibilities of his self-consciousness.
It immediately becomes clear that the topic of the issue under consideration is heterogeneous and ambiguous. After all, freedom and responsibility, giving rise to each other, are philosophically mutually exclusive concepts.
For example, a policeman, pursuing an armed criminal and protecting his own and others' lives, has every right to kill him and thus does not go beyond the rights granted to him by law.
But with the same action, this police officer crosses the line of permissible influence on the freedom of the murderedof a person, and therefore, in moral terms, even exceeds the boundaries of what is permitted, which are allowed to him by society. At the same time, from the point of view of the same society, the policeman will be right. If the persecuted, defending himself, kills the guardian of the law, then society considers this murder as an aggravating circumstance and an excess of the rights of the killer in relation to the victim …
I would like to note that freedom and responsibility should be inseparable not only within the framework of the law and conscience of a person. The meaning of these concepts, their correct understanding should be inculcated by parents and educational institutions from the very moment of a person's birth and his formation as a person. Otherwise, "to be free" will become equivalent to "succumb to anarchy" for him, and responsibility will only be a cage, which will inevitably lead to deviant behavior of a person and will pose a threat not only to him, but to society as a whole.
Recommended:
Public authorities: concept, types, structure and responsibility
If you rely on the third article of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the source of power in the country is the people of all nationalities present in it, which exercises it using public authorities. The term "public authority" for various reasons is not enshrined in federal laws and the term "state authority" serves instead. In addition to state power, the people have local self-government bodies
Freedom of a person's choice. The right to freedom of choice
Freedom of choice is an integral norm of human existence. It is prescribed by the norms of international law and guaranteed by the Constitution
Party "Freedom" and its leader - Tyagnibok Oleg Yaroslavovich. Biography and family of a politician
Oleg Tyagnibok, whose biography will be described in this article, did not accidentally become such a successful person. According to the politician himself, his monthly income is 15 thousand hryvnia - as the salary of the leader of the All-Ukrainian Association Svoboda party
Restrictions and prohibitions related to municipal service: legislative framework, working conditions and responsibility of employees
Restrictions and prohibitions related to the municipal service: general characteristics. He alth status, age, military duty, citizenship, family circumstances and other cases. The ban on doing business, engaging in political activities and behavior in ordinary life situations. Liability under applicable law
Freedom and responsibility of the individual. The problem of human freedom and responsibility
Responsibility is the so-called price of freedom. The problem of freedom and responsibility is relevant in any country in the world, which makes it a priority, and finding a solution is a paramount task