With an indisputable evidence base, it has been established that a person all his life only does what he learns. Therefore, to the question of what a school is, there is a direct answer - this is life. You can't force anyone to learn anything. But you can drag. But coached information disappears faster than spilled ether.
A free person learns both deeper and more effectively. Bondage depresses primarily mental faculties. And it is quite understandable that some individuals in the field of their hobby achieve amazing perfection. And in the field of professional knowledge, which often feeds a person, he is lame in two legs.
School is a place of free time
The lexical meaning "school" comes from the Latin language. This word means a time that is free from the hassle of stuffing the stomach and pleasing the mortal body, i.e. it's leisure. It is not always correct to call what we have available now a school. There are many unreasonable restrictions. Teaching is carried out on those things that are needed only by those who teach.
And thisit is wonderful that pupils and students, often subconsciously, ignore everything, and this is contrary to the natural need for a rational being to learn. If they try to format a person, then this action can be compared to a crime. Hiding information, whatever it may be, is a direct theft of it from all of humanity.
A free rational being can assimilate and process such volumes of information with amazing efficiency that it will take more than one millennium until such machines are created that in this aspect will be equal to it. Any ordinary small child can serve as an example. In three years, he learns his native language in its entirety, and with it all the ethical norms of the people, and at the same time he never even sweats from mental work.
A school should be a school
No one denies the great importance of the school in a person's life, but this is not the merit of the school itself as such. Young people are happy on their own.
And it is their inner worlds that fill the grayness of modern school life with that special atmosphere, which is then remembered with aching nostalgia. The idea to gather children in one place and pass on the experience of humanity to them was great. But there is no need to filter knowledge and say at the same time that young people will not understand. They live. And they decide what is good and what is bad. After all, what is a school? This is an island where blooming youth has gathered in the midst of an ocean of fading lives, which, in fact, are needed only for the ovary to appear on these flowers.
Educationalproforma
Modern school programs are not outdated, worse: the principles of their construction are wrong.
Great Russian literature, as an example, makes people sick after going to school. In a large city of almost a million people, two copies of Pushkin's works were bought in a bookstore in a year. One - "The Tale of the Golden Cockerel" with drawings; the second - "The Queen of Spades" without drawings. And the city is a reader. This is a school…
No paradoxes
When our entire society realizes the meaning of the word school, then strange and outrageous paradoxes will disappear. A person who dreams of being a cook all his life should work as a cook, not a literary critic. We need to give young people the opportunity to educate, and not educate them in a way they do not see themselves in the future.
The biggest paradox is that, having lost the meaning of the word "school", we are trying to raise its authority. A whole generation, trained in the 60s, 70s and 80s, did not find its place in life in the changed economic conditions. And it was those who were on the sidelines who studied well and excellently at school. And the C students, on the contrary, adapted, because they didn’t assimilate unnecessary information very diligently, their mind remained uncomplexed. The paradox is that the potential of the most capable and diligent students is ruined. This is good? Is there an understanding in society of what a school is? And why was it invented by mankind at all?
Let the man learn what he loves
Our media sometimes laugh merrily with the fact that in America forty-fiftypercent of the population is unaware that the planet Earth revolves around the sun, have not heard of Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno. And Zadornov supports them in this, calls the Americans stupid and even idiots.
He still lives in the old notions of what school is. He himself would really learn, think and understand that in fact there are no stupid people in principle. You need to have in your head only what you want yourself, and not stuck in by order.
Should education be compulsory?
For a farmer who loves his land and sees the field as flat, it's too much work to explain that the Earth is round, that amphibrach differs from anapaest in one way or another. And here they explain, and then they don’t know how to return people to the village so that the fields are not overgrown with weeds. Everyone rushed to exchange amphibrachs, even those who knew how to talk with cows without any additional training as with people. And why? Yes, because even the very word "collective farmer" evokes associations with an inferior person in the public mind. And this is not true. Knowledge of a living organism is very valuable.
By restoring to the school exactly the purpose that it originally had, our country will turn the we alth of nature with the talents of our people into such prosperity that it will conquer the whole world even without bombs. Anyway, I really want to believe it.
